🚀 Federal Reserve Updates

Market Overview
Read time 1.4 minutes

Year To Date Performances:

At Jackson Hole, Powell Walks the Line Between Patience and Pressure

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell arrived in Jackson Hole this year with more baggage than the mountain air could carry. Markets were desperate for clarity. The White House was agitating for relief. And economists—still smarting from the scars of “transitory” inflation—were waiting to see if the Fed would signal its next move. Powell gave them something, but not everything: a carefully hedged suggestion that the path ahead may lead to rate cuts, tempered with warnings that the risks remain unusually tangled.

“With policy in restrictive territory, the baseline outlook and the shifting balance of risks may warrant adjusting our policy stance,” Powell said, a line that set traders buzzing even as it underscored his determination not to be cornered into premature promises. It was classic Powell: cautious, data-dependent, and stubbornly protective of the central bank’s independence in the face of political headwinds.

The remarks, delivered at the Fed’s annual symposium in Jackson Hole, landed in an environment that has grown more complicated by the week. The labor market remains sturdy and unemployment low, but tariffs and shifting trade policies have introduced fresh uncertainty. Prices are no longer spiraling upward as they did in 2022, yet they aren’t comfortably settled either. The specter Powell sketched—rising costs colliding with slowing growth—wasn’t far from the stagflationary trap that haunted central bankers in the 1970s.

Markets seized on the nuance anyway. Within minutes of Powell’s words hitting the tape, the Dow surged more than 600 points and Treasury yields tumbled, a reflexive sign that investors are betting the Fed will cut rates when it meets again in mid-September. But behind the rally was an unspoken truth: the Fed is being asked to solve problems monetary policy can’t fix. Tariffs, immigration shifts, and unpredictable fiscal measures—all outside the Fed’s mandate—are muddying the waters through which Powell must steer.

Complicating matters further is the political backdrop. Former President Donald Trump has been unusually blunt in his demands for sharp cuts, framing Powell and the Fed as obstacles to growth. Powell, without mentioning Trump by name, delivered a pointed reminder: “FOMC members will make these decisions, based solely on their assessment of the data and its implications for the economic outlook and the balance of risks. We will never deviate from that approach.” It was as much a defense of central bank autonomy as it was a preview of the Fed’s next policy shift.

This year’s Jackson Hole meeting also marked the conclusion of a five-year review of the Fed’s framework—the same review that in 2020 led to the now-infamous “average inflation targeting” policy. That strategy was designed to tolerate modestly higher inflation in exchange for a fuller recovery in jobs. Instead, inflation spiked to forty-year highs, the Fed was caught flat-footed, and Powell spent much of the past three years rebuilding credibility. His remarks this week carried a note of contrition: “There was nothing intentional or moderate about the inflation that arrived… The past five years have been a painful reminder of the hardship high inflation imposes, especially on those least able to meet the higher costs of necessities.”

For Powell, then, the balancing act is not just between growth and inflation, but between humility and authority, between acknowledging past mistakes and convincing the public he can navigate the future. By reaffirming the Fed’s commitment to its 2% inflation target, he planted a flag in consistency, even as critics debate whether that benchmark still makes sense in a volatile global economy.

In the end, Powell gave no guarantees. What he offered instead was a posture—cautious, deliberate, unwilling to bend to politics or markets—that may itself be the most valuable signal he could send. The Fed may cut rates next month, or it may wait. But if Jackson Hole revealed anything, it’s that Powell believes central banking, at its core, is about keeping your options open long enough to make the least damaging choice.

Quick Note:

Donald Trump escalated his battle with the Federal Reserve on Friday, threatening to fire Governor Lisa Cook if she refuses to resign amid allegations of mortgage fraud. Cook, a Biden appointee and ally of Fed Chair Jerome Powell, has denied the claims and said she will not be “bullied” out of her post, even as the Department of Justice confirmed it will investigate. The move comes after Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte, a Trump ally and outspoken Powell critic, accused Cook of improperly claiming two properties as primary residences. If Trump succeeds in removing her “for cause,” he would gain another chance to reshape the Fed’s board, where two of his appointees already dissent from Powell’s decisions, potentially tilting policy toward his push for faster rate cuts. Democrats, led by Sen. Elizabeth Warren, blasted the effort as a political ploy, while Powell used the Fed’s Jackson Hole gathering to warn that tariffs are driving inflation even as growth slows.

Are you looking to grow your business? Here is how I can help: 

📱Book a Strategy Call to get 1:1 feedback on your pitch, pitch deck and/or fundraising strategy. (If you need general startup advice, then reply to this email, and I’ll let you know if/how I can help.)

Onwards and Upwards,

Liam Gill

* This is sponsored content